Capitalism. Companies focus all of their energies convincing us that we need all sorts of things. For women, one of those things happens to be shoes. I don’t blame them. We have all been indoctrinated into consumerism basically since birth. Barbie dolls, GI Joe, whatever. The short answer is that they have been duped by an elaborate plot so compelling that they actually believe they posses that “insatiable lust for shoes.” Sadly they are only trying to fill an emotional need that can not be met by anything purchased. Sadly, we all do it. Even those of us who are aware of marketing practices. I really do like capitalism, but I admit that the free market has been compromised by the manipulation of the “demand” aspect of supply and demand.
“Are you laughing or are you buying it?”–Ray Cappo
Tags: askKeller, consumerism, economics, marketing
Posted in Uncategorized, ask Keller | Comments (1)
Ben Nichols of Lucero’s recently released solo Ep. is powerful and haunting. I have not had an album invoke this type of reaction since I first heard Tennessee. I find myself captivated from the first track to the last. The general tempo of the album is slow, much like Lucero’s “Tennessee”, but remains primarily acoustic apart from an occasional steel guitar. The album leans more towards a western, rather than southern feel which is appropriate, considering the theme. The album is a concept, centered around Cormac McCarthy’s novel “Blood Meridian.” If you aren’t familiar with McCarthy, you might recognize “All the Pretty Horses,” “No Country for Old Men,” or “The Road,” which have all been made into major motion pictures. I digress to mention this, only because his worth as an author warrants it. Ben’s heart wrenching voice and story telling ability have done great justice to the novel. If you are a fan of real country or folk music, or just a fan of Lucero, do not hesitate to purchase this album.

Tags: Ben Nichols, Blood Meridian, Cormac McCarthy, Country, Lucero, Music Reviews, The Road
Posted in Country, Literature, Music Reviews | Comments (0)
Thank you Chris. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. Seitan tends to be higher in protein, versatile, and is easy to make at home. The drawback is that it is farther removed from the whole-food source. The primary ingredient is wheat gluten flower. While flour is quite simply, ground wheat berries, wheat gluten flower requires additional processing to isolate the gluten. Tempeh, on the other hand is made from whole soy beans. This gives gives it a considerable advantage over it’s more processed counterpart. Furthering its case, tempeh is a cultured product. The fermentation that takes place helps to “pre-digest” parts of the bean which facilitates the absorption of nutrients. Tempeh is also much higher in fiber and lower in sodium than seitan and most other foods, for that matter. The main drawback to tempeh, is the difficulty in making it at home. There is a steep learning curve for growing your own cultures. The temperature ranges necessary to maintain a stable culture require special equipment. Seitan, on the other hand, is much like making bread. It requires only a bowl and possibly a pot, depending on the recipe. This gives seitan a leg up in the area of cost effectiveness. To buy the tempeh equivalent to the amount of seitan I use weekly, would land me in the poor house. Additionally, making your seitan at home allows you to control the use of sodium and preservatives, which offsets some of its disadvantages. All in all, I admit that tempeh is a better protein source from a health standpoint, but I prefer seitan for its flavor, versatility and cost. Below is a link to one of my favorite seitan recipes. It is highly adaptable to any flavors you would like to include.
http://www.postpunkkitchen.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=15959&p=1
Posted in Veganisim, ask Keller | Comments (0)
I thought you were going to challenge me. It is obviously Kurt Engle. OK, Seriously…this a broad question. There are countless considerations, such as, the most skilled, or the most successful in competition. Likewise it could be the one who developed the most revolutionary techniques, or the one who has had the greatest influence on grappling. By these standards, I’m inclined to nominate Rickson Gracie, qualified by his undefeated record in four hundred plus fights. I might also nominate Helio Gracie for his influence on contemporary grappling. Through careful deliberation I have not chosen Rickson or Helio despite their obvious qualifications.
Linguistic dissection of the question affords me considerable latitude in my choice. Obviously the superlative “greatest” is meant to be applied to “grapple” plus the inflection “-er,” or one who grapples, but it does not explicitly indicate that this individual must be greatest at grappling. Considering this convenient oversight, I choose to read this question: Who is the greatest person who grapples or has ever grappled? With that in mind, I cannot think of a better choice than Theodore Roosevelt. Not only is he a bad ass, but a great American. He was surely the greatest man I know of who was also a grappler. Argue amongst yourselves if you must, but for me the matter is certainly decided. Below is an excerpt from a letter he sent to his son.
In addition to training as a weightlifter, boxer, wrestler, fencer, and (of course) shooter, Roosevelt was a student of judo/jiujitsu. He lined the White House recreation room with mats to train in jiujitsu, creating what may have been the first Western dojo.
From a letter to son Kermit, dated 02/24/1905:
Yesterday afternoon we had Professor Yamashita up here to wrestle with Grant. It was very interesting, but of course jiu jitsu and our wrestling are so far apart that it is difficult to make any comparison between them. Wrestling is simply a sport with rules almost as conventional as those of tennis, while jiu jitsu is really meant for practice in killing or disabling our adversary. In consequence, Grant did not know what to do except to put Yamashita on his back, and Yamashita was perfectly content to be on his back. Inside of a minute Yamashita had choked Grant, and inside of two minutes more he got an elbow hold on him that would have enabled him to break his arm; so that there is no question but that he could have put Grant out. So far this made it evident that the jiu jitsu man could handle the ordinary wrestler. But Grant, in the actual wrestling and throwing was about as good as the Japanese, and he was so much stronger that he evidently hurt and wore out the Japanese. With a little practice in the art I am sure that one of our big wrestlers or boxers, simply because of his greatly superior strength, would be able to kill any of those Japanese, who though very good men for their inches and pounds are altogether too small to hold their own against big, powerful, quick men who are well trained.
From “Theodore Roosevelt’s Letters to His Children” edited by Joseph Bishop.
Tags: America, Gracie, grappling, jiu jitsu, Theodore Roosevelt, White House, Wrestling, Yamashita
Posted in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, MMA, ask Keller | Comments (1)
My friend, you test me, as you are unequivocally more qualified on this matter, but supposing that this is more a riddle than a question, the “best” submission from the mount is the one your opponent gives you. I would also contend that any submission that does not compromise your position in the attempt is superior to one that does. This being said, a standard arm bar is less ideal than a belly down arm bar or choke.
My personal favorite is the triangle choke. By allowing an opening I encourage an attempt to escape out the back. This affords me several options including the opportunity to maintain a dominant position if I should miss the attempt. Here is an example of the fine gentlemen at Submissions 101 demonstrating the technique.
Bear in mind, this video shows falling to the back to complete the submission which is not necessary and compromises your position. I suggest finishing it from the top.
Now that I have made my case, I would like to know your thoughts.

Tags: ask Keller, BJJ, grappling, jiu jitsu, s-mount, submission, triangle choke
Posted in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, ask Keller | Comments (5)
Ok, so here is the idea. I have a broad range of interests and expertise, and I am interested in imparting whatever wisdom I may have to whomever may need it. Nothing is explicitly off the table. If it happens to be an area where I lack, I will research a reliable source to satisfy your query. I expect that queries, while not limited to, will largely be regarding my opinion on one matter or another. Please consider that in most cases, I am not inclined toward the use of euphemisms and am less inclined to tell you only what you want to hear. If you don’t really want to know, I suggest you direct your question elsewhere. That being said, lets get the ball rolling. Here’s how it will work: Send your queries directly, through the Ask Keller Form at the top of the page. I will get back to you if I feel clarification is necessary. In absence of extenuating circumstances you can expect an answer within 24 hours. Please do not leave questions in a comment, as they may go unnoticed.
If I might recommend some topics: Travel, Veganism, Fitness, Interior Design, Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Muay Thai, Marine Corps, Straightedge and Literature are ripe choices.
Tags: BJJ, Interior Design, Literature, MMA, Muay Thai, Redlands, Straightedge, Travel, USMC, Vegan
Posted in ask Keller | Comments (6)